Observatory
Corpus Gap Analyzer
What the corpus does NOT have, ranked by severity. The analyses below derive entirely from the existing observatory data — no new claims are made; instead, the corpus's own counts are turned back on themselves to surface where the support is thin. Every theory has gaps; this page makes them visible rather than inferring around them.
Weakest theories
Five theories with the lowest support_score. The corpus advances these
as positions but has not yet attached evidentiary anchors of the kind
that move them out of tier 4.
loading…
Orphan-case classifications
The classification tags appearing in cases the corpus has classified
as
demands_new_theory. Tags with no theory home — i.e.
no anchored case in any theory shares that classification — are
highlighted as homeless.
loading…
Thin-anchored theories
Theories with anchored cases but fewer than three — brittle support.
A single counter-explained case could collapse the support tier.
loading…
Status distribution
Every case in the catalogue carries a corpus_status as of the
2026-06-09 annotation sweep. The distribution is the corpus's
honest self-assessment: how much of the record stays open once
each case is held to its documented core.
loading…