Intake Transcript — Subject ████-7144, Recall Onset

FROM:

OMC-3 Intake (S. Aboagye, interviewer)

TO:

NEW-3 Desk Analyst (case carry); OMC-1; OMC-2; Continuity Officer

RE:

Intake transcript excerpt — Subject ▆▆▆▆-7144. Recall onset confirmed. Cross-reference OMC-1 cycle product 26-04, paragraph 3.

1. Onset summary

Subject 7144 presented to a primary-care physician in ▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆, NE Sector, on 19 May 2026 (day 35 overdue) reporting “vivid intrusive imagery” on waking, sleep-onset paralysis, and one episode of dissociative fugue (duration ~40 minutes, recovered without intervention). The physician is a flagged-network provider; the referral to OMC-3 intake was made same-day per standing protocol.

Subject was brought in voluntarily under a cover-story referral (“specialist sleep clinic, federally funded study, travel reimbursed”). She is currently a guest of the facility at ▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆▆. Cover narrative is holding.

2. Transcript excerpt — Intake interview, 22 May 2026, 10:14 local

The following is excerpted from the second of three intake sessions. Subject was not under sedation. Interviewer is OMC-3 (Aboagye). Subject is 7144.

OMC-3: And when you say the room “wasn’t a room” — can you describe what you mean by that?

7144: It had — it had a floor that wasn’t level. Like the floor went down toward the middle. I was on a table and the table was level but the floor wasn’t. The light came up from the floor, not down from above. I keep thinking about the light coming from underneath.

OMC-3: Was there anyone with you in the room?

7144: Three. There were three. I don’t — I want to say “people” but they weren’t. They weren’t tall. They were — the proportions were wrong. They were patient. That’s the thing I keep getting stuck on. They weren’t in a hurry. They were doing something they had done before.

OMC-3: Doing something to you?

7144: Doing something with me. Like I was — like I was part of the equipment. Not the patient. The equipment. Does that make sense?

OMC-3: It does. You’re doing very well. Can you tell me how you got home?

7144: That’s the part I can’t — there’s the room and then there’s my kitchen. There’s nothing in between. I made coffee. I remember the coffee was already in the pot from the morning before, but it was still warm, which is — that’s the thing that’s wrong, isn’t it? That’s the thing that doesn’t fit.

OMC-3: [pause] Let’s take a break.

[REDACTED — SECTION 4.2.b: remainder of session, including subject’s reference to the marker compound by smell]

3. Disposition

Recall integrity is partial — high-risk. Subject retains episodic imagery of the Procedure environment, retains affect (“they were patient”), and has independently identified the temporal discontinuity (the warm coffee). She has not yet attached an etiology to the imagery; she currently believes she is experiencing a sleep disorder. This window is closing.

Re-redaction package authorized under standing OMC-3 charter, scheduled 26 May 2026. Sedation protocol: standard-plus (subject is overdue and tolerance is uncertain). Post-redaction observation: 96 hours on-site, then return under cover narrative (“treatment-resistant; referred home with sleep hygiene plan”).

NEW-3 is requested to monitor open-source signal for subject’s name and a curated list of phrases (Annex A) for 180 days post-Return. Any hit at confidence ≥0.6 escalates to Continuity.

S. Aboagye, Intake Officer OMC-3 22 May 2026